![]() |
The role of the valuationIn order to establish the price range, a vendor must first determine what the property is likely to fetch in the current market, and secondly, whether or not to sell in the current market. (The vendor may decide to postpone the sale until the market becomes more favourable if the valuation indicates that the current market is unlikely to meet the vendor’s expectations.)It must be remembered that the valuation does not tell the vendor what price the vendor should accept. Rather, the valuation is simply a means by which the vendor can "test the market", to see what the market is likely to pay for the property. It is also important to bear in mind that the valuation is an estimate, an indication, an opinion. No purchaser will pay a price based on a valuation unless the purchaser wants the property. Similarly, if a purchaser wants this property and no other, he or she will not be constrained by the valuation, and may bid well above the valuation in order to buy the property. Because the valuation is an estimate, tolerances are needed before it can be used as the basis for an asking price. This is the purpose of the price range. Allowance is made for the possibility that the valuation may be a little too ambitious, or a little too conservative. A reasonable tolerance is established by setting the price range at figures that are 5% below and 5% above the valuation. Here's how the valuation is used:
Does the vendor have to accept a bid made at the higher figure?No. It is possible that that a first bid, made at the upper end of the price range, is just the start of a spirited competition between keen purchasers, and the vendor is entitled to negotiate with all interested parties. The vendor is entitled to the "best price" the market will bear, and there are no constraints on negotiation, even if it does take the parties beyond the price range.NOTE: It is unfair, unethical and illegal to attract interest in a property by advertising a price range if the vendor does not genuinely intend to consider bids made within the price range. What is "best price"?Ask any vendor what they hope to achieve through the sale of their property, and the answer usually comes down to a concept known as the "best price".Note the difference between “best price” and “asking price”. The “asking price” is a notional figure arrived at by the vendor at the start of the sale, whereas the “best price” is the final figure arrived at during final negotiations. While the "best price" may initially appear to be a matter of money, a careful analysis of a sale transaction reveals that the dollar value of the property is not the only factor to be taken into consideration. When determining the best price it is necessary to also consider the terms and conditions of the sale. Look at it this way. Is a bid of $310,000 with a special condition requiring the vendor to spend $15,000 on repairs better than an unconditional bid of $300,000? The answer to this question is easy. But the possible terms and conditions a purchaser may insert into a contract are many and varied, and can have an enormous impact on the “best price”. Proper negotiation is essential for achieving of the “best price”. Negotiating priceThe myth of the estate agent negotiatorOur first comment on negotiation is that, contrary to popular belief, estate agents are not skilled negotiators. In fact, estate agents are not negotiators at all. Estate agents are simply facilitators. They bring two parties together and thereby facilitate the sale, but they cannot negotiate the sale.Why can’t estate agents negotiate? First, the estate agent is commission-driven on a needs-to-win basis. If there is no sale, there is no commission for the estate agent. This, in turn, means that the estate agent cannot include a “No sale” in his or her set of possible outcomes. According to the authors of the leading book on negotiation "Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In" knowing and developing alternatives to reaching an agreement with the other party in a negotiation is an important source of power. Every sale through an estate agent trumpets to the purchaser, “Vendor MUST sell!” Given that the estate agent must bring about a sale in order to have been “successful”, there is a high potential for one party to emerge as a “winner” and the other as a “loser”. For example, if the estate agent talks the vendor into accepting a low price, in order to satisfy the purchaser and to bring about a sale, the vendor may be the “loser”. The problem is that estate agents act for BOTH parties in a sale transaction. First, the estate agent acts for the purchaser by acting as the purchaser’s only means of contact with the vendor. The estate agent usually “assists” the purchaser to fill in the contract, and then presents the purchaser’s bid to the vendor. The estate agent will try to get the purchaser’s bid to the point that it looks attractive to the vendor, and then the bid is presented to the vendor for consideration. Who receives the purchaser’s bid on behalf of the vendor? That’s right, the same estate agent. The estate agent receives the purchaser’s bid, determines whether or not the vendor should accept it, then advises the vendor. The result is likely to be a sale for the vendor and a commission for the estate agent. But has the vendor achieved the “best price”? In most real estate transactions the estate agent achieves not the “best price” but merely an “acceptable price”. This is because the estate agent cannot negotiate on behalf of both parties. Reducing the negotiated agreement to writingConcluding verbal negotiations is only the first step in negotiating a real estate sale. The crucial stage the is production of a written agreement in the form of a written contract.A contract drafted by an estate agent is often simply a "one size fists all" arrangement.. In most cases neither party fully understands the terms and conditions, and they only discover their rights and obligations after the estate agent posts a copy of the document to the lawyers. Estate agents are not trained to draft contracts. In fact, it is illegal for an estate agent to do any more than to fill in the blanks of a standard form document. Standard form documents were introduced in order to bring a degree of uniformity into real estate sales. Unfortunately, the use of standard documentation has resulted in a one-size-fits-all mentality. It is quite common for lawyers to find that a party whose contract has been drafted by an estate agent is stuck with a very standard contract, when the agreement reached verbally was not standard at all! The contract is not simply a document that dictates terms to the parties. The contract should be the final written agreement, as worked out by the two parties. Negotiating the "best price" in the circumstancesSo, when we talk about the "best price" we're really talking about "the best price in the circumstances". It soon becomes apparent that pricing a property is no easy task, as the circumstances of the sale can change for a variety of reasons:
The "best price" cannot be determined at the start of the sale; it is a flexible concept, depending on timing and a variety of other factors. The "best price" is actually determined at the time of sale, after open and transparent negotiations have determined a sale price and sale terms which are acceptable to both parties. How the market affects priceThe real estate market is extremely complex, despite the efforts of industry and the media to describe it as "booming" or "flat" etc.
ConclusionDetermining the price of a property is not simply a matter of a vendor deciding on a figure at the start of the sale. Any sale will commence with an “asking price” and conclude with the “best price”. Lawyers Real Estate is always able to achieve the best price because we ensure that the sale is based on a contract, tailored according to the negotiated agreement, and not a "fill in the blanks" form forced upon the parties by a real estate agent with no legal training. Legal Notice |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||